Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study assesses pedicle screw fixation effects on postoperative outcomes in cervical surgeries, suggesting improved alignment with more screws.
Study design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To determine whether increased pedicle screw use in the lower subaxial cervical spine (C5-C7) improves sagittal alignment after posterior–anterior–posterior (PAP) surgery. Method A total of 108 patients who underwent posterior–anterior–posterior (PAP) surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disease were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups according to the distal fixation level: Group 1, pedicle screw fixation limited to C7; Group 2, pedicle screw fixation limited to C6-7; and Group 3, pedicle screw fixation extending to C5-6-7. Cervical sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, at 3 months, and at 1 year. Results Baseline sagittal parameters were similar among groups. CL increased in all groups but was significantly greater in Groups 2 and 3 than in Group 1 postoperatively (21.8° and 26.1° vs 14.2°) and at 1 year (22.3° and 26.0° vs 14.8°; P < 0.05). T1S–CL decreased significantly in Groups 2 and 3 but not in Group 1 at 3 months (8.5° and 3.4° vs 16.6°; P < 0.001) and at 1 year (7.7° and 7.3° vs 17.8°; P < 0.001). Group 1 showed greater vertical height loss (3.9 vs 2.3 and 2.2 mm; P = 0.016) and higher subsidence rates. C2-7 SVA, C2 SVA, and clinical scores improved in all groups without between-group differences. Conclusions Greater use of pedicle screws at C5-C7 enhanced sagittal alignment correction compared with C7-only fixation, while clinical outcomes were similar across groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: