Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates algebraic growth of birational transformations in Cremona group, suggesting significant trends.
We initiate the study of the “algebraic growth” of groups of automorphisms and birational transformations of algebraic varieties. Our main result concerns <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Bir</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msup> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> Bir(P²) , the Cremona group in 2 variables. This group is the union, for all degrees <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>d</m:mi> <m:mo>≥</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> d≥ 1 , of the algebraic variety <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Bir</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msup> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mi>d</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:math> Bir(P²)d of birational transformations of the plane of degree 𝑑. Let <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>N</m:mi> <m:mi>d</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> Nd denote the number of irreducible components of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="sans-serif">Bir</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msup> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mi>d</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:math> Bir(P²)d . We describe the asymptotic growth of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>N</m:mi> <m:mi>d</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> Nd as 𝑑 goes to <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> +∞ , showing that there are two constants 𝐴 and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>B</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> B>0 such that <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>A</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:msqrt> <m:mrow> <m:mi>ln</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>d</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:msqrt> </m:mrow> <m:mo>≤</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>ln</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo maxsize="160%" minsize="160%">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>ln</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo maxsize="160%" minsize="160%">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:munder> <m:mo lspace="0em" movablelimits="false">∑</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>e</m:mi> <m:mo>≤</m:mo> <m:mi>d</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:munder> <m:msub> <m:mi>N</m:mi> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:mrow> <m:mo maxsize="160%" minsize="160%">)</m:mo>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calabri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: