Rheumatoid arthritis was not associated with increased carotid intima media thickness compared to healthy controls (0.556 mm vs 0.573 mm, p=0.220).
Cross-Sectional (n=360)
No
Mean Difference: 0.017 (95% CI -0.01–0.045)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.556% vs 0.573%
p-value: p=0.220
OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been identified as an independent cardiovascular risk factor. The importance of risk factors such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia in the generation of atherosclerosis in RA patients is unclear. This study analyzed clinical parameters associated with carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) in patients with RA. METHODS: Subjects with RA and healthy controls without RA, both without known cardiovascular disease, were included. Participants underwent a standard physical examination and laboratory measurements including a lipid profile. cIMT was measured semi-automatically by ultrasound. RESULTS: In total 243 RA patients and 117 controls were included. The median RA disease duration was 7 years (IQR 2-14 years). The median DAS28 was 2.4 (IQR 1.6-3.2) and 114 (50.4%) of the RA patients were in remission. The presence of RA and cIMT were not associated (univariate analysis). Multivariable regression analysis showed that cIMT in RA patients was associated with age (B = 0.006, P<0.001) and systolic blood pressure (B = 0.003, P = 0.003). In controls, cIMT was associated with age (B = 0.006, P<0.001) and smoking (B = 0.097, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: cIMT values were similar between RA patients and controls. Hypertension was strongly associated with cIMT in RA patients. After adjustment, no association between cIMT and specific RA disease characteristics was found in this well treated RA cohort.
Stoep et al. (Tue,) conducted a cross-sectional in Rheumatoid arthritis (n=360). Rheumatoid arthritis vs. Healthy controls without RA was evaluated on Carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) (MD 0.017, 95% CI -0.010-0.045, p=0.220). Rheumatoid arthritis was not associated with increased carotid intima media thickness compared to healthy controls (0.556 mm vs 0.573 mm, p=0.220).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: