Feasibility study demonstrates a two-step ADC-PSAD-GWR rule aids biopsy decisions, suggesting reduced unnecessary procedures.
To test the feasibility of a two-step rule integrating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), PSA density (PSAD), and gadolinium wash-in/wash-out rate (GWR) in stratifying prostate lesions for biopsy decision-making, and to compare its performance with PI-RADS v2.1 within a retrospective single-center cohort. This retrospective case series included 110 patients (mean age 70 ± 9 years) who underwent 3.0-T mpMRI and prostate surgery. ADC, PSAD, and GWR were measured from index lesions. Optimal cutoffs (ADC 0.747 × 10⁻³ mm²/s, PSAD 0.344 ng/mL², GWR 9.454%) were derived by 5-fold cross-validation. A two-step rule was constructed: step 1 assigned lesions to four ADC-PSAD quadrants (Q1–Q4); step 2 refined risk using GWR. Performance was compared descriptively with PI-RADS. The four-quadrant framework identified Q2 (low ADC/high PSAD) as the malignant-dominant quadrant and Q3 (high ADC/low PSAD) as predominantly benign. GWR refinement defined a subgroup (Q3 with low GWR) that contained no clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) among the 20 patients assigned. In the sensitivity analysis (all-grade PCa vs. benign), the same subgroup contained zero cancers. Compared with PI-RADS, the two-step rule avoided 35.1% (13/37) of unnecessary biopsies in PI-RADS ≥ 4 and detected all occult csPCa in PI-RADS ≤ 3 (12/12). Overall csPCa detection was 97.6% (41/42). Sensitivity analysis yielded consistent findings: unnecessary biopsy avoidance of 46.4% (13/28) and all-grade cancer detection of 98.0% (48/49). This feasibility study suggests that the two-step ADC-PSAD-GWR rule may help guide biopsy decisions by identifying a low-risk subgroup where biopsy may be safely deferred. However, due to the retrospective, single-center design and lack of external validation, the findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. No claim of superiority over PI-RADS or reduction in patient-important outcomes (e.g., mortality) is made. Question: Can a two-step rule combining ADC, PSAD, and gadolinium wash-in/wash-out rate assist in stratifying prostate lesions and guide biopsy decisions within a feasibility setting? Findings: In this retrospective case series of 110 patients, the two-step rule identified a low-risk subgroup (Q3-low GWR) with zero clinically significant cancers, and showed the potential to defer biopsy in 35% of PI-RADS ≥ 4 benign lesions while detecting all occult csPCa in PI-RADS ≤ 3 lesions. Clinical relevance: As an exploratory feasibility tool, this objective rule may offer a practical adjunct to mpMRI interpretation by identifying a defined low-risk subgroup for potential biopsy deferral. Prospective external validation is required before clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: