For over a decade, the AMPS "Firewall" paradox has forced an irreconcilable fracture in theoretical physics, requiring the abandonment of either the equivalence principle or the unitarity of quantum mechanics. This paradox relies entirely on a false foundational assumption: that the spatial vacuum possesses infinite data-processing capacity, allowing an infalling particle to maintain its continuous kinematic degrees of freedom across the event horizon. This repository contains the formal manuscript and executable computational proof falsifying the AMPS Firewall. By mapping the event horizon strictly as a macroscopic Bekenstein-Landauer saturation boundary (C₂ₑ₈ₓ), we demonstrate that the dissolution of quantum entanglement requires no infinite energy barriers, non-local signaling, or procedural physics equations. The ICF Hammer (Declarative Physics): Traditional quantum models rely on procedural equations of motion. The Python engine provided in this repository is purely declarative. We do not write a single line of code instructing the entanglement connection to break, and we do not program a firewall to sever it. We simply enforce the strict thermodynamic capacity limit of the spatial vacuum. When the localized geometric capacity required to anchor an entangled channel drops to zero, the channel mathematically ceases to exist. The distant eigenmode structurally decoheres as a deterministic, emergent thermodynamic necessity. The firewall is a mathematical hallucination; it is herein replaced by topological dissolution. Repository Contents: EntanglementSaturationBoundary. pdf: The complete theoretical manuscript, including the embedded storyboard and cross-domain unified index. EntanglementStoryboard. png: High-resolution, 2-panel diagram detailing the physical geometry of the saturation crossing. EntanglementDissolution. gif: High-resolution animated proof of the topological dissolution. icfₑntanglementₖillshotₑngine. py: The executable declarative Python script. README. md: Repository documentation and execution instructions.
Mark A. Edwards (Mon,) studied this question.