Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Speculative research develops scalar-field charge in EAS, indicating a novel understanding of charge concepts.
This paper is archived as a speculative research work. This paper develops the scalar-field origin of the finite electric-charge class in Entanglement Algebraic Spacetime (EAS). Charge is not introduced as a primitive scalar value, scalar sign, current, gauge field, photon, force, or spacetime field. It is identified as the conserved exterior full-cycle compression of handedness-induced second-order ordering (SOO) response from coherent bounded supports. A coherent handed support induces a three-channel exterior source report rho_H on coherent exterior receivers, and the unique additive, cyclically invariant, completed-support-normalized compression of this report gives the finite charge class Q_hat = C_Q(rho_H). The paper further distinguishes charge sign from relationship strength: charge sign is support-handedness orientation, while interaction strength is the degree of coherent relational-path participation. Opposite-handed overlap restores local handedness balance and can pass into handedness-insensitive SOO recurrence; same-handed overlap creates local handedness imbalance and is read at the interface as repulsion-facing. The same source report can be organized into a finite report-level exterior source-response equation, and its compressed charge class enters a finite Maxwell-form report equation. When Q_hat is inserted into the EAS finite QED spectral skeleton and paired with the spacetime spectral triple in the NCG construction, it supplies the finite charge-class input for the Maxwell/QED source equation. The result gives a scalar-field account of charge class, sign, additivity, conservation, finite Maxwell-form source structure, and photon-like mediation; it does not derive the empirical coupling e, the fine-structure constant, continuum spacetime, scattering amplitudes, or the full quantized QED path integral.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Labhard (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: