Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of therapy and analyse the effect of therapy compliance in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: A decision analysis using the Markov model was performed for four different therapeutic strategies using peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin or interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin. Clinical data were obtained from available published reports and from the Spanish health system perspective. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin at a fixed dose, compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin, was 8478 euros per life year saved and 3737 euros per quality-adjusted life year gained. Good therapeutic compliance and weight-adjusted doses of ribavirin decreased the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to 1636 euros per life year saved and 721 euros per quality-adjusted life year gained. In compliant genotype 1 patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio decreased to 916 euros per life year saved and 404 euros per quality-adjusted life year gained, with an increase from 64 to 69 years in the threshold age at which therapy was cost-effective. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that changes in the values of the most relevant parameters do not modify the study outcomes. CONCLUSION: From the clinical and pharmaco-economics perspective, the use of decision therapeutic analysis models suggests that the most effective therapy for chronic hepatitis C is peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin adjusted to patient body weight and with good compliance, particularly in genotyped patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buti et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: