Traditionally, technology seems to have had a rather clear function in language learning: for example to practise grammar, provide information about target countries, make long-distance communication possible, bring in the outside world and access digital corpora. The computer can thus be seen as a versatile and widely applicable tool, and the learner could be described using Levi-Strauss’s concept of the bricoleur who ‘is adept at performing a large number of diverse tasks’ (1966:17). This paradigm can be contrasted with a view of technology as an automaton (Skinner 1968), according to which technology plays an important role in giving feedback and reinforcing material that is taught. In language learning, drill-and-practice applications provide good examples of this latter way of using computers. Typically, these programs have a strong sense of what is right and wrong, which might not always correspond to how language is used in the real world, but they do of course, have a clear pedagogical function. In this chapter, we will be concerned with technology used in language learning, not primarily as a tool or an automat, but as an arena for constructivist learning (see Svensson and Ågren 1999). A three-year project, the Virtual Wedding Project (VW Project), carried out at the Department of Modern Languages and HUMlab at Umeå University will serve as a case study. In this recently finished project, advanced students of English constructed collaborative assignments in the target language, contexualised in a graphical virtual environment in which they acted as virtual construction workers, hypertext authors and community builders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrik Svensson (2025) studied this question.