Key result
CycleGAN semi-supervised domain adaptation improves ECG individual identification accuracy versus training on original signals alone.
Why the study?
Consistent ECG electrode patch placement is difficult across trials, and gathering ECG data from varied locations to account for signal differences requires substantial labor and time.
A semi-supervised domain adaptation method using CycleGAN improves the accuracy of individual identification from ECG signals by accounting for variations in electrode placement.
When acquiring electrocardiogram (ECG) signals, the placement of electrode patches is crucial for acquiring electrocardiographic signals. Constant displacement positions are essential for ensuring the consistency of the ECG signal when used for individual identification. However, achieving constant placement of ECG electrode patches in every trial for data acquisition is challenging. This is because different individuals may attach patches, and even when the same person attaches them, it may be difficult to specify the exact position. Therefore, gathering ECG data from various locations is necessary. However, this process requires a substantial amount of labor and time, owing to the requirement for multiple attempts. Nonetheless, persisting with these efforts enables the endurance of some ECG differences. To reduce labor and time, we propose a semi-supervised domain adaptation for individual identification using ECG signals. The method operates with a full set of original ECG signals and a small set of ECG signals from different placements to account for the differences between the signals in the generative adversarial network (CycleGAN). Specifically, to train the CycleGAN, the ECG signals were transformed into time–frequency representations, and the trained generator was used to generate ECG signals to expand the small set of ECG signals from different placements. Subsequently, both the original and generated signals were used to train the classifier for individual identification. This scenario can also be applied to the classification of ECG signals from different sensors. The PTB-ECG dataset was used for this experiment. We found that the proposed method showed higher accuracy than when only the original ECG signals were used for the training classifier.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byeon et al. (2023) studied Individual identification from ECG signals. Semi-supervised domain adaptation using CycleGAN vs. Training classifier using only original ECG signals was evaluated on Accuracy of individual identification. Semi-supervised domain adaptation using CycleGAN for individual identification from ECG signals showed higher accuracy than using only original ECG signals for training the classifier.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: