Identifies early gene profiles predicting 90-day ischemic stroke outcomes, suggesting potential targets for treatment.
This study identified early immune gene responses in peripheral blood associated with 90-day ischemic stroke (IS) outcomes and an early gene profile that predicted 90-day outcomes. Peripheral blood from the CLEAR trial IS patients was compared to vascular risk factor matched controls. Whole-transcriptome analyses identified genes and networks associated with 90-day IS outcome (NIHSS-NIH Stroke Scale, mRS-modified Rankin Scale). The expression of 467, 526, and 571 genes measured at ≤3, 5 and 24 hours after IS, respectively, were associated with poor 90-day mRS outcome (mRS=3-6), while 49, 100 and 35 associated with good mRS 90-day outcome (mRS=0-2). Poor outcomes were associated with up-regulated MMP9 , S100A12 , interleukin-related and STAT3 pathways. Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) revealed modules significantly associated with 90-day outcome. Poor outcome modules were enriched in down-regulated T cell and monocyte-specific genes plus up-regulated neutrophil genes and good outcome modules were associated with erythroblasts and megakaryocytes. Using the difference in gene expression between 3 and 24 hours, 10 genes correctly predicted 100% of patients with Good 90-day mRS outcome and 67% with Poor mRS outcome (AUC=0.88) in a validation set. The predictors included AVPR1A , which mediates platelet aggregation, release of coagulation factors and exacerbates the brain inflammatory response; and KCNK1 ( TWIK-1 ), a member of a two-pore potassium channel family, which like other potassium channels likely modulates stroke outcomes. This study suggests the immune response after stroke impacts long-term functional outcomes. Furthermore, early post-stroke gene expression may predict stroke outcomes and outcome-associated genes could be targets for improving outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amini et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: