PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2000American Economic Review255 citationsOpen Access

Mentoring and Diversity

View Full Paper
SASusan AtheyCAChristopher AveryPZPeter Zemsky

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We study how diversity evolves at a firm with entry-level and upper-level employees who vary in ability and “type” (gender or ethnicity). The ability of entry-level employees is increased by mentoring. An employee receives more mentoring when more upper-level employees have the same type. Optimal promotions are biased by type, and this bias may favor either the minority or the majority. We characterize possible steady states, including a “glass ceiling,” where the upper level remains less diverse than the entry level. A firm may have multiple steady states, whereby temporary affirmative-action policies have a long-run impact. (JEL J71, J41, D20)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Athey et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fd40ea4de9175b7353194https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.765
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper