Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychophysiological and psychological arousal patterns of individuals who self-mutilate during imaged self-mutilation were examined. Imaged control events (accidental injury, anger, neutral) were compared between self-mutilation and control groups. Personalised guided imagery scripts were presented in four stages: scene setting. approach, incident, and consequence. Results depicted a decrease in psychophysiological arousal when self-mutilation participants imaged cutting themselves. A decrease in psychological response was not evident until after cutting. Responses to self-mutilation imagery were different from those demonstrated during control imagery. A comparison of reponses to self-mutilation imagery between past and currently self-mutilating participants indicated no difference in the psychophysiological arousal pattern to self-mutilation imagery. A lag was evident for psychological arousal for the retrospective sample but not for the current group. These results indicated that self-mutilative behaviour is maintained by the psychophysiological and psychological tension-reducing qualities of the act. When a person is no longer engaging in the behaviour. the feelings associated with the act are open to reinterpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brain et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: