Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The availability of detailed river flow data across large geographic areas is needed for several scientific applications, and the focus of this work was to develop a spatially referenced global river flow data set for use in environmental risk assessments for substances entering rivers. This paper provides a publicly available spatially resolved global spatial data set, which can be readily used in aquatic exposure models. This paper explores applying the well-established curve number (CN) method to estimate surface water runoff, which was used as the basis for estimating river flows. Input needed to implement the CN method was from freely and publicly available global data sets on hydrologic soil groups, land cover, and precipitation. The runoff data were then spatially combined with publicly available global hydrological data sets of catchments and rivers to estimate daily mean annual flows across the globe on a level-12 catchment scale. Estimated daily mean annual flows were compared with measured gauge flows at rivers in several countries, which showed good correlation (R2 of 0.71–0.99) on a river catchment level. Additionally, flows were compared on a sub-basin level, which also correlated well with measured gauge flows, with an R2 of 0.9 (log transformed) across basins in several countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vamshi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: