The new GP contract in English primary health care: an ethnographic study

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the impact of contracts on general practise in the UK National Health Service. In particular, it is concerned with the response of practitioners to the apparent flexibilities offered in the new contract with its focus on outcomes rather than processes. Design/methodology/approach Ethnographic studies of two general practices, using non‐participant observation, documents and interviews with staff over a five‐month period. Findings Conclusions suggest that the new contracts, far from encouraging flexibility and responsiveness from general practitioners, have tended to strengthen bureaucratic forms in the way the contract is implemented. Originality/value The new contract has introduced greater clarity regarding roles and responsibilities within practises. At the same time, when operating in financially tight conditions, the contract can make rationing more explicit. Decisions are made not in accordance with the targets but in light of local pressures and constraints, causing tensions between primary and tertiary care.