To slow or not to slow' We offer our assessment of the original article and trace its legacy, in particular Nordhaus's later series of 'DICE' models. From this work, many have drawn the conclusion that an efficient global emissions abatement policy comprises modest and modestly increasing controls. We use DICE itself to provide an initial illustration that, if the analysis is extended to take more strongly into account three essential elements of the climate problemthe endogeneity of growth, the convexity of damage and climate riskoptimal policy comprises strong controls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dietz et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: