Key result
High-intensity exercise acutely enhanced brachial artery flow-mediated dilation 10 minutes postexercise (from 4.8% to 9.1%, P<0.01), whereas low-intensity exercise did not.
Why the study?
Does an acute bout of high-intensity exercise improve conduit and resistance artery function compared to low-intensity exercise in healthy older adults?
Does an acute bout of high-intensity exercise improve conduit and resistance artery function compared to low-intensity exercise in healthy older adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.1% vs 6.2%
p-value: p=<0.01
High-intensity exercise acutely improves conduit artery function in healthy older adults, whereas resistance artery function improves regardless of exercise intensity.
Acute high-intensity exercise may transiently improve conduit artery function in older adults; hypothesis-generating for intensity-specific vascular effects.
PURPOSE: Modulation of vascular function follows an exercise intensity-dependent pattern in young adults. This study aimed to investigate the potential intensity-dependent effects of an acute bout of exercise on conduit and resistance artery function in healthy older adults. METHODS: Eleven healthy older adults (five males/six females, 66 ± 1 yr) completed 30 min of recumbent cycling at 50%-55% (low intensity) and 75%-80% (high intensity) of their age-predicted HRmax on two separate study visits. Doppler ultrasound measures of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and reactive hyperemia were taken at baseline, 10 min postexercise, and 1 h postexercise. In addition, cardiovascular hemodynamics and brachial shear rate were measured every 5 min during exercise. RESULTS: Brachial artery FMD was enhanced 10 min after high-intensity exercise (4.8% ± 0.2% to 9.1% ± 0.3%, P < 0.01), but not low-intensity (4.7% ± 0.2% to 6.2% ± 0.3%, P = 0.54) exercise. Peak and total (area under the curve) blood flow during reactive hyperemia (measures of resistance artery function) were enhanced 10 min postexercise for both intensities (peak low intensity, 372 ± 31 to 444 ± 37 mL·min; peak high intensity, 391 ± 30 to 455 ± 28 mL·min; total low intensity, 142 ± 16 to 205 ± 20 mL; total high intensity, 158 ± 14 to 240 ± 25 mL; main effect of time for both, P < 0.05). However, the magnitude of change in peak and the total blood flow were not different between exercise intensities (interaction effect; P = 0.56 and P = 0.97, respectively). Independent of exercise intensity, FMD returned to baseline 1 h after exercise (high, 5.9% ± 0.3%; low, 5.1% ± 0.1%; both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that high-intensity exercise acutely enhances conduit artery function in healthy older adults. In addition, an acute bout of exercise enhances resistance artery function independent of intensity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwamoto et al. (2017) studied Healthy older adults (n=11). High-intensity exercise (75%-80% HRmax) vs. Low-intensity exercise (50%-55% HRmax) was evaluated on Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) 10 min postexercise (p=<0.01). High-intensity exercise acutely enhanced brachial artery flow-mediated dilation 10 minutes postexercise (from 4.8% to 9.1%, P<0.01), whereas low-intensity exercise did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: