Key result
Heart rate and heart rate variability monitoring using bio-sensors may complement or replace glucocorticoid measures as better predictors of stress state and fitness in free-living animals.
Why the study?
Assessing the impact of stressors in animals has relied mostly on glucocorticoid measures, which may be too simplistic to capture complex physiological responses.
Heart rate and heart rate variability measured via bio-loggers may serve as better predictors of sympathetic-adrenal-medullary system activation than glucocorticoids for assessing stress in free-living animals.
May inform wildlife stress protocols; leaves open clinical translation and human validation trials.
Quantifying how whole organisms respond to challenges in the external and internal environment ("stressors") is difficult. To date, physiological ecologists have mostly used measures of glucocorticoids (GCs) to assess the impact of stressors on animals. This is of course too simplistic as Hans Seyle himself characterized the response of organisms to "noxious stimuli" using multiple physiological responses. Possible solutions include increasing the number of biomarkers to more accurately characterize the "stress state" of animal or just measuring different biomarkers to more accurately characterize the degree of acute or chronic stressors an animal is experiencing. We focus on the latter and discuss how heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) may be better predictors of the degree of activation of the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary system and complement or even replace measures of GCs as indicators of animal health, welfare, fitness, or their level of exposure to stressors. The miniaturization of biological sensor technology ("bio-sensors" or "bio-loggers") presents an opportunity to reassess measures of stress state and develop new approaches. We describe some modern approaches to gathering these HR and HRV data in free-living animals with the aim that heart dynamics will be more integrated with measures of GCs as bio-markers of stress state and predictors of fitness in free-living animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaidica et al. (2020) conducted a review in Stress in animals. Heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring vs. Glucocorticoids (GCs) was evaluated. Heart rate and heart rate variability monitoring using bio-sensors may complement or replace glucocorticoid measures as better predictors of stress state and fitness in free-living animals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: