Key result
Statewide pay-for-performance metric boosts post-EVAR surveillance adherence to ~78%, linked to lower mortality.
Why the study?
Although national guidelines recommend long-term surveillance after EVAR, adherence varies greatly; this study evaluated the impact of a statewide performance metric linked with financial reimbursement on EVAR follow-up and outcomes.
Does a statewide performance metric linked to financial reimbursement improve 1-year surveillance imaging and reduce mortality in patients undergoing elective EVAR?
Observational (n=5,742)
Yes
Does a statewide performance metric linked to financial reimbursement improve 1-year surveillance imaging and reduce mortality in patients undergoing elective EVAR?
Absolute Event Rate: 77.69% vs 26.46%
A statewide pay-for-performance metric significantly improved 1-year EVAR surveillance rates, which was associated with increased detection of complications requiring reintervention but markedly decreased 1-year mortality.
BACKGROUND National guidelines recommend long-term surveillance after endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) to monitor for endoleaks, graft migration or device failure. However, investigations have demonstrated that adherence to EVAR surveillance can vary greatly. Recently, the BMC2 Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) implemented a statewide performance metric, linked with financial reimbursement, designed to improved EVAR postoperative surveillance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of this statewide metric on EVAR follow-up and long-term endovascular outcomes. METHODS The BMC2 statewide cardiovascular consortium consisting of 36 hospitals was queried for patients who underwent EVAR between 2017-2023. Patient, hospital and operative risk factors were collected and analyzed based on the presence or absence of follow-up EVAR surveillance imaging. The primary outcome was adherence to recommended EVAR surveillance and the longitudinal change in percent of EVARs that obtained surveillance imaging. RESULTS A total of 5,742 patients underwent EVAR between 2017-2023. During the implementation of the EVAR surveillance metric, there was steady increase in the annual percentage of EVARs across the state who received postoperative 1-year EVAR surveillance imaging (26.46% in 2017 to 77.69% in 2023). On mixed logistic modeling, predictors of incomplete post-EVAR 1-year surveillance included emergent operation, length of stay and non-home discharge. For those patients that received appropriate EVAR surveillance imaging follow-up they displayed a higher number of repeat interventions (2.7% vs.1.6%; p<0.005) but had a decrease in one-year mortality (0.7% vs 10.6%; p<0.001) compared to those did not receive 1-year EVAR surveillance. CONCLUSIONS Incomplete imaging surveillance following EVAR remains high and predisposes patients to worse survival outcomes. Utilization of a performance metric both with associated financial incentive, within a statewide quality collaborative is a viable strategy that can have a significant impact on increasing EVAR surveillance and decreasing one-year mortality after endovascular AAA repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) post-EVAR (n=5,742). Statewide EVAR surveillance performance metric (Pay-for-Performance) vs. Pre-implementation (2017) was evaluated on Adherence to post-EVAR 1-year surveillance imaging. Implementation of a statewide pay-for-performance metric increased adherence to 1-year post-EVAR surveillance imaging from 26.46% in 2017 to 77.69% in 2023, which was associated with decreased one-year mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: