Key result
Off-pump CABG resulted in no significant difference in overall SF-36 score changes compared to on-pump CABG at 8 years, except for lower social functioning in the off-pump group (p=0.038).
Why the study?
Does off-pump CABG improve health-related quality of life compared to on-pump CABG in elderly high-risk patients?
RCT (n=120)
randomized
Does off-pump CABG improve health-related quality of life compared to on-pump CABG in elderly high-risk patients?
Off-pump CABG does not provide a long-term clinically relevant improvement in health-related quality of life compared to on-pump CABG in elderly high-risk patients.
BACKGROUND: Potential long-term gain in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using off-pump coronary revascularization in elderly patients >70 years has not yet been fully elucidated. AIM: We compared HRQoL in elderly moderate- to high-risk patients 3 months, 12 months, and 8 years after randomization to either off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: After randomization and before heart surgery, 120 consecutive patients were asked to fill in the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Major Depression Inventory diagnostic scale for self-report of HRQoL. Postoperatively, the same questionnaires were mailed to the patients. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the change of SF-36 scores between the groups except in the social functioning subscale, where the 8-year score was significantly higher for the on-pump group than the off-pump group (p=0.038). In the on-pump group, all scores improved from baseline to 8 years, with the highest improvement in most of the domains after 8 years. In the off-pump group, there was an improvement in four of the eight domains from baseline to 8 years, with the highest improvement in most of the domains after 12 months. By contrast, there was a noticeable decrease in bodily pain, social functioning, and mental health at 8 years after off-pump operation. No patients showed signs of depression after 8 years. CONCLUSION: HRQoL SF-36 scores seemed to improve more in patients undergoing on-pump CABG compared with patients undergoing off-pump surgery, although no long-term clinically relevant difference between the groups could be demonstrated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Østergaard et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease requiring bypass grafting (n=120). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting vs. On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was evaluated on Change in SF-36 scores. Off-pump CABG resulted in no significant difference in overall SF-36 score changes compared to on-pump CABG at 8 years, except for lower social functioning in the off-pump group (p=0.038).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: