Key result
A novel single-beat method significantly reduced interobserver variability in estimating maximum isovolumic pressure compared to the established method in PAH patients (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does a novel single-beat method based on the second derivative of the pressure waveform reduce interobserver variability in estimating right ventricular maximum isovolumic pressure compared to the established first-derivative method in PAH patients?
Observational
Yes
Does a novel single-beat method based on the second derivative of the pressure waveform reduce interobserver variability in estimating right ventricular maximum isovolumic pressure compared to the established first-derivative method in PAH patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel single-beat method using the second derivative of the pressure waveform significantly reduces interobserver variability in assessing right ventricular contractility in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Clinical assessment of right ventricular (RV) contractility in diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has been hindered by the lack of a robust methodology. Here, a novel, clinically viable, single-beat method was developed to assess end-systolic elastance (E es ), a measure of right ventricular (RV) contractility. We hypothesized that this novel approach reduces uncertainty and interobserver variability in the estimation of the maximum isovolumic pressure (P iso ), the key step in single-beat methods. The new method was designed to include a larger portion of the RV pressure data and minimize subjective adjustments by the operator. Data were obtained from right heart catheterization of PAH patients in a multicenter prospective study ( data set 1) and a single-center retrospective study ( data set 2). To obtain P iso , three independent observers used an established single-beat method (based on the first derivative of the pressure waveform) and the novel method (based on the second derivative). Interobserver variability analysis included paired t-test, one-way ANOVA, interclass correlation (ICC) analysis, and a modified Bland-Altman analysis. The P iso values obtained from the two methods were linearly correlated for both data set 1 ( R 2 = 0.74) and data set 2 ( R 2 = 0.91). Compared with the established method, the novel method resulted in smaller interobserver variability ( P < 0.001), nonsignificant differences between observers, and a narrower confidence interval. By reducing uncertainty and interobserved variability, this novel approach may pave the way for more effective clinical management of PAH. NEW & NOTEWORTHY A novel methodology to assess right ventricular contractility from clinical data is demonstrated. This approach significantly reduces interobserver variability in the analysis of ventricular pressure data, as demonstrated in a relatively large population of subjects with pulmonary hypertension. This study may enable more accurate clinical monitoring of systolic function in subjects with pulmonary hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellofiore et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Novel single-beat method (second derivative of pressure waveform) vs. Established single-beat method (first derivative of pressure waveform) was evaluated on Interobserver variability in the estimation of the maximum isovolumic pressure (P iso) (p=<0.001). A novel single-beat method significantly reduced interobserver variability in estimating maximum isovolumic pressure compared to the established method in PAH patients (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: