Key result
Daily Wim Hof method fails to improve resting blood pressure or other cardiovascular parameters.
Why the study?
This study evaluated the effects of a 15-day Wim Hof method intervention on cardiovascular parameters at rest and during a cold pressor test, as well as on various psychological parameters.
Does a 15-day daily Wim Hof Method intervention improve cardiovascular and psychological parameters in healthy males?
RCT (n=42)
Open-label
computer-generated random number table
No
Does a 15-day daily Wim Hof Method intervention improve cardiovascular and psychological parameters in healthy males?
Absolute Event Rate: 121% vs 119%
p-value: p=0.839
A 15-day daily intervention of the Wim Hof Method did not significantly improve cardiovascular or psychological parameters in healthy males.
No cardiovascular or psychological benefit from 15-day Wim Hof method in healthy males; challenges efficacy claims and leaves open effects in patients.
The Wim Hof method (WHM) is a multi-disciplinary approach to physical and mental well-being combining cold exposure, breathing exercises, and meditation. This study evaluated the effects of a 15 days WHM intervention on cardiovascular parameters at rest and during a cold pressor test (CPT), as well as on various psychological parameters. Forty two participants were randomized into an intervention (IG) and a control group. Throughout the 15 days intervention, the IG performed the WHM daily. Before and after the intervention, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse wave velocity (PWV), heart rate (HR), root mean sum of squared distance (RMSSD), and standard deviation of RR-intervals (SDNN) were assessed at rest and during a CPT. Furthermore, perceived stress (PSS), positive affect (PANAS+), negative affect (PANAS-), and subjective vitality (trait (SVSt) and state (SVSs)) was determined. No significant time × group interactions could be detected in HR (p = 0.709); RMSSD (p = 0.820), SDNN (p = 0.186), SBP (p = 0.839), DBP (p = 0.318), PWV (p = 0.983), PANAS+ (p = 0.427), PANAS- (p = 0.614), SVSt (p = 0.760), SVSs (p = 0.366), and PSS (p = 0.364). No significant time × group effects could be detected during the CPT (ΔHR: p = 0.596; ΔSBP: p = 0.366; ΔDBP: p = 0.999; ΔPWV: p = 0.635; perceived pain: p = 0.231). Performing the WHM daily did not exert positive effects on cardiovascular and psychological parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ketelhut et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=42). Wim Hof method vs. Normal daily activities was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP) at rest (p=0.839). Performing the Wim Hof method daily for 15 days did not exert significant positive effects on cardiovascular parameters, including systolic blood pressure (p=0.839), or psychological parameters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: