Previous work on representing proximity data by tree structures is reviewed. The authors then present two paradigms for data collection and develop appropriate measurement structures for non‐numerical data. Two theorems on representing these data by rooted or unrooted trees are given and their relationship to the more conventional representation by a dissimilarity index is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colonius et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: