Key result
A set of 11 individual quality measures grouped into four domains by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons are useful as quality improvement tools in assessing the quality of CABG surgery.
Why the study?
Coronary artery bypass graft is associated with a high risk of mortality and morbidity, making assessment of surgery quality necessary.
What are the evidence-based measures used to assess the quality of coronary artery bypass graft surgery?
What are the evidence-based measures used to assess the quality of coronary artery bypass graft surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The STS quality measures provide a structured, evidence-based framework for assessing and improving the quality of CABG surgery.
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is associated with a high risk of mortality and morbidity; thus, assessment of surgery quality is necessary. In this perspective, we will focus on the structure, process, and outcomes measured as quality assessment. A set of 21 evidence-based structure, process, and outcome measures were selected as National Quality Forum. Of these, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons ultimately chose 11 individual quality measures grouped them into four domains used to assess the quality of CABGs. These four domains consisted of perioperative medical care, operative care, risk-adjusted operative mortality and postoperative risk-adjusted major morbidity. These measures have been useful as quality improvement tools in assessing the quality of CABG surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) conducted a review in Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Quality assessment measures was evaluated. A set of 11 individual quality measures grouped into four domains by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons are useful as quality improvement tools in assessing the quality of CABG surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: