PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 14, 2011PLoS ONE200 citationsOpen Access

Changes in Human Fecal Microbiota Due to Chemotherapy Analyzed by TaqMan-PCR, 454 Sequencing and PCR-DGGE Fingerprinting

JZJutta ZwielehnerCLCornelia LaßlBHBerit Hippe

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether chemotherapy with the presence or absence of antibiotics against different kinds of cancer changed the gastrointestinal microbiota. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Feces of 17 ambulant patients receiving chemotherapy with or without concomitant antibiotics were analyzed before and after the chemotherapy cycle at four time points in comparison to 17 gender-, age- and lifestyle-matched healthy controls. We targeted 16S rRNA genes of all bacteria, Bacteroides, bifidobacteria, Clostridium cluster IV and XIVa as well as C. difficile with TaqMan qPCR, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprinting and high-throughput sequencing. After a significant drop in the abundance of microbiota (p = 0.037) following a single treatment the microbiota recovered within a few days. The chemotherapeutical treatment marginally affected the Bacteroides while the Clostridium cluster IV and XIVa were significantly more sensitive to chemotherapy and antibiotic treatment. DGGE fingerprinting showed decreased diversity of Clostridium cluster IV and XIVa in response to chemotherapy with cluster IV diversity being particularly affected by antibiotics. The occurrence of C. difficile in three out of seventeen subjects was accompanied by a decrease in the genera Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Veillonella and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Enterococcus faecium increased following chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Despite high individual variations, these results suggest that the observed changes in the human gut microbiota may favor colonization with C. difficile and Enterococcus faecium. Perturbed microbiota may be a target for specific mitigation with safe pre- and probiotics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zwielehner et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fe957c1b320180d0da011https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028654
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Indications for antibiotic use in ICU patients: a one-year prospective surveillance1997 · 214 citations
  2. 2Alteration of the Ileal Microbiota of Weanling Piglets by the Growth-Promoting Antibiotic Chlortetracycline2009 · 100 citations
  3. 3Mucositis as a biological process: a new hypothesis for the development of chemotherapy-induced stomatotoxicity1998 · 570 citations
  4. 4Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea, a frequent complication in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia2009 · 68 citations
  5. 5Impact of Combinations of Antineoplastic Drugs on Intestinal Microflora in 9 Patients with Leukaemia2002 · 14 citations