Key result
Prophylactic intravenous corticosteroid use during CABG surgery increased from 17.5% in 2003 to 22.6% in 2014 (annual rate = 0.42%; P<.001), with high between-hospital variation.
Why the study?
What are the temporal trends and between-hospital variations in prophylactic intravenous corticosteroid use during CABG surgery?
Observational (n=401,788)
Yes
What are the temporal trends and between-hospital variations in prophylactic intravenous corticosteroid use during CABG surgery?
Prophylactic corticosteroid administration during CABG has gradually increased in the US since 2003, but remains highly variable across hospitals.
Rising corticosteroid prophylaxis in CABG amid weak evidence against benefit; leaves open need for trials to standardize practice.
BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials have documented clinical benefits associated with prophylactic corticosteroid administration at the time of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, including a reduction in the risk of atrial fibrillation and hospital length of stay. Despite the published data, the extent to which providers have adopted the perioperative use of corticosteroids remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess temporal trends, between-hospital variation, and determinants of perioperative intravenous corticosteroid use during CABG surgery. METHODS: We identified all patients admitted for CABG surgery in the Premier Healthcare Database (2003-2014), a large US-based inpatient database. We determined the proportion of patients administered prophylactic corticosteroids on the day of CABG surgery. Linear time-series models were used to estimate the rate and trend of corticosteroid use over time. Separate multivariable generalized estimating equation models were used to quantify the variation in and determinants of perioperative corticosteroid use. RESULTS: Of 401 788 eligible patients who underwent a CABG surgery between 2003 and 2014, 20% (n = 80 681) were administered intravenous prophylactic perioperative corticosteroids (methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, or hydrocortisone). Corticosteroid use increased from 17.5% in 2003 to 22.6% in 2014 (annual rate = 0.42%; P < .001). Individual hospitals accounted for >50% of variation in corticosteroid use. High between-hospital variation was also observed, and the probability of utilization was ≥32.4% in the upper versus ≤3.4% in the bottom quartiles of hospitals. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic corticosteroid administration during CABG has increased gradually since 2003. To further evaluate the risk-benefit trade-off associated with their use, we believe a large-scale outcomes study is warranted to assess this highly variable practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donneyong et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery (n=401,788). Perioperative intravenous corticosteroids was evaluated on Proportion of patients administered prophylactic corticosteroids on the day of CABG surgery (annual rate = 0.42%, p=<.001). Prophylactic intravenous corticosteroid use during CABG surgery increased from 17.5% in 2003 to 22.6% in 2014 (annual rate = 0.42%; P<.001), with high between-hospital variation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: