Key result
Online Mind Sound Resonance Technique cuts anxiety, sleep disturbance, and stress by ~37% versus PMR.
Why the study?
Stress-related strain is a concern for individuals with domestic and caregiving demands, but the short-term psychological and physiological outcomes of yoga-based relaxation practices like Mind Sound Resonance Technique within specific settings remain of practical interest.
Does online Mind Sound Resonance Technique improve psychological and physiological stress markers in female homemakers compared to Progressive Muscle Relaxation?
RCT
randomized
Does online Mind Sound Resonance Technique improve psychological and physiological stress markers in female homemakers compared to Progressive Muscle Relaxation?
An 8-week online Mind Sound Resonance Technique intervention significantly improved psychological well-being and physiological stress markers in female homemakers compared to Progressive Muscle Relaxation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports online Mind Sound Resonance Technique for stress reduction in female homemakers; extends RCT evidence for accessible mind-body interventions.
Background and Study Aim. Stress-related psychological and physiological strain represents a relevant concern in populations exposed to sustained domestic and caregiving demands. Yoga-based relaxation practices, including Mind Sound Resonance Technique (MSRT), have been applied in clinical and non-clinical contexts to support stress regulation in everyday life. Although such approaches are increasingly used, their application and short-term outcomes within specific sociocultural settings remain a matter of practical interest. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the psychological and physiological outcomes associated with the application of Mind Sound Resonance Technique in female homemakers. Materials and Methods. A randomized controlled design was employed. Female homemakers were allocated to either an MSRT intervention group or an active control group receiving Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR). The intervention was delivered online over an eight-week period. Psychological outcomes included anxiety, sleep quality, and perceived stress. Physiological measures comprised resting heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate. Assessments were conducted at baseline and post-intervention. Results. Participants in the MSRT group demonstrated greater improvements across psychological and physiological outcomes compared with the PMR group. Reductions were observed in anxiety (34.01%), sleep disturbance (37.54%), and perceived stress (37%). Improvements were also noted in resting heart rate (−12.07%), systolic blood pressure (−7.97%), diastolic blood pressure (−8.40%), and respiratory rate (−25.99%). All between-group differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001) and were accompanied by large effect sizes. Conclusions. When implemented in an online, home-based format, MSRT was associated with greater improvements in psychological well-being and physiological stress markers than an established relaxation comparator among homemakers. These findings support the practical applicability of MSRT as an accessible, low-cost stress-management strategy for populations facing barriers to conventional wellness services. Further studies are warranted to examine long-term sustainability and broader implementation across diverse settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saha et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Stress-related psychological and physiological strain. Mind Sound Resonance Technique (MSRT) vs. Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) was evaluated on Psychological (anxiety, sleep quality, perceived stress) and physiological (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate) outcomes (p=<0.001). Online Mind Sound Resonance Technique significantly reduced anxiety (34.01%), sleep disturbance (37.54%), and perceived stress (37%) compared to Progressive Muscle Relaxation (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: