Why the study?
Ordering hs-cTnI tests without clear clinical indication can lead to unnecessary workups and inappropriate management, prompting investigation into ED physicians' rationale for testing.
Does defensive medicine drive the overuse of hs-cTnI testing in patients with non-cardiac complaints in the emergency department?
Observational (n=1,890)
No
Does defensive medicine drive the overuse of hs-cTnI testing in patients with non-cardiac complaints in the emergency department?
A significant proportion of hs-cTnI tests in the emergency department are ordered for patients with non-cardiac complaints, largely driven by defensive medicine and medicolegal concerns.
Defensive medicine may drive hs-cTnI overuse in ED non-cardiac patients; leaves open whether reducing medicolegal pressure decreases unnecessary testing.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac troponin I is routinely measured in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. However, when a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) test is ordered without a clear clinical indication, unexpectedly elevated levels can lead to unnecessary diagnostic workups and inappropriate management. This study aimed to investigate physicians' rationale for performing hs-cTnI tests in an emergency department (ED). METHODS: In this prospective study, 1890 patients who underwent hs-cTnI measurement during their stay in an ED were included. Upon arrival, patients were classified into two groups based on their chief complaints: cardiac (36.6%) and non-cardiac (63.4%). Forty-seven ED physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire to assess their perspectives on the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) testing in the ED. RESULTS: Out of the 47 ED physicians who responded to the questionnaire (94% response rate), 97.9% indicated that the purpose of hs-cTnI testing in the ED was to diagnose an acute cardiac event. However, 38.3% reported ordering hs-cTnI tests in non-cardiac patients due to medicolegal concerns. Additionally, 53% admitted to working under medicolegal pressure, and 50% believe they would have ordered fewer hs-cTnI tests if not for this medicolegal threat. CONCLUSIONS: defensive medicine is prevalent among ED physicians, and routine use of hs-cTnI testing as part of an evaluation can be explained in part by concern about liability and defensive medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayyad et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Emergency department patients undergoing hs-cTnI testing (n=1,890). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) testing for non-cardiac complaints vs. hs-cTnI testing for cardiac complaints was evaluated on Proportion of physicians ordering hs-cTnI tests in non-cardiac patients due to medicolegal concerns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: