Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Departing from the transformation of everyday life into “projects,” this article explores the notion of a future that is radically open, yet foreclosed by catastrophe, notably in relation to climate change. Drawing on Agamben's The Time that Remains, it explores an alternative futurity that interpolates a Pauline messianism with recent thinking on cosmological extinction and capitalism read through the Freudian death drive. In seeking to cheat an economic regime of a violence that paradoxically feeds off the failure to prevent its own destruction, the suggestion is that “the time of the project” itself must be brought to an end.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S.R. Bayly (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: