Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A virtual ligand-based screening approach was designed and evaluated for the discovery of new A(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) ligands. For comparison and evaluation, the procedures from a recently published virtual screening study that used the A(2A) AR X-ray crystal structure for the target-based discovery of new A(2A) ligands were largely followed. Several screening models were constructed by deriving the distinguishing structural features from selected sets of A(2A) AR antagonists, so-called frequent substructure mining. The best model in statistical terms was subsequently applied to large-scale virtual screens of a commercial vendor library. This resulted in the selection of 36 candidates for acquisition and testing. Of the selected candidates, eight compounds significantly inhibited radioligand binding at A(2A) AR (>30%) at 10 μM, corresponding to a "hit rate" of 22%. This hit rate is quite similar to that of the referenced target-based virtual screening study, while both approaches yield new, non-overlapping sets of ligands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horst et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: