We study robustness of the adaptive backstepping design with tuning functions for linear systems. Under assumptions on unmodeled dynamics and disturbances equal to those for certainty equivalence schemes, we address an adaptive scheme not based on the certainty equivalence principle. In the process of redesign for robustness we employ only leakage in the estimator; we do not employ normalization, neither static nor dynamic. A fundamental difference between the tuning functions design and the certainty equivalence designs is that the controller in the former is inherently nonlinear, while in the latter it is nonlinear only in the parameter estimate. As a result, achievable robustness results for the tuning functions scheme are not global but regional, with a region of attraction inversely proportional to the "size" of the unmodeled dynamics. The tracking error is proportional to the size of the uncertainties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikhouane et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: