High-power inverters for traction drives employ in the upper range of stator frequency special pulse control methods, optimized synchronous pulsewidth modulation (PWM), mainly in combination with rotor-flux-oriented control schemes, and direct self-control (DSC) which encompasses motor control and pulse pattern generation. The well-known symmetrized sinusoidal PWM is only to be used in the lower speed range. This paper presents and compares exemplarily the stationary behavior of these two control methods; criteria are inverter peak current, motor harmonic losses, torque ripple, and DC-link harmonics. For these low switching frequencies DSC shows, in spite of its simplicity, a very good overall performance, mainly by avoiding the imperfect use of switching frequency by the synchronous pulse patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andreas Steimel (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: