Fog computing brings the cloud closer to a user with the help of a micro data center ( <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$mdc$</tex-math> ), leading to lower response times for delay sensitive applications. RT-SANE ( R eal- T ime S ecurity A ware scheduling on the N etwork E dge) supports batch and interactive applications, taking account of their deadline and security constraints. RT-SANE chooses between an <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$mdc$</tex-math> (in proximity to a user) and a cloud data center ( <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$cdc$</tex-math> ) by taking account of network delay and security tags. Jobs submitted by a user are tagged as: private, semi-private and public, and <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$mdcs$</tex-math> and <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$cdcs$</tex-math> are classified as: trusted, semi-trusted and untrusted. RT-SANE executes private jobs on a user’s local <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$mdcs$</tex-math> or pre-trusted <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$cdcs$</tex-math> , and semi-private and public jobs on remote <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$mdcs$</tex-math> and <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$cdcs$</tex-math> . A security and performance-aware distributed orchestration architecture and protocol is made use of in RT-SANE. For evaluation, workload traces from the CERIT-SC Cloud system are used. The effect of slow executing straggler jobs on the Fog framework are also considered, involving migration of such jobs. Experiments reveal that RT-SANE offers a higher “success ratio” (successfully completed jobs) to comparable algorithms, including consideration of security tags.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: