Key result
Fecal metaproteome profiling identifies high-risk cardiovascular clusters linked to a ~9 mmHg blood pressure difference.
Why the study?
Does fecal metaproteomics analysis identify distinct cardiovascular risk profiles in healthy individuals and heart failure patients?
Observational
Does fecal metaproteomics analysis identify distinct cardiovascular risk profiles in healthy individuals and heart failure patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fecal metaproteomics identifies distinct gut-to-host mechanisms and protein clusters that correlate with cardiovascular risk and heart failure severity.
The gut microbiota is a crucial link between diet and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Using fecal metaproteomics, a method that concurrently captures human gut and microbiome proteins, we determined the crosstalk between gut microbiome, diet, gut health, and CVD. Traditional CVD risk factors (age, BMI, sex, blood pressure) explained < 10% of the proteome variance. However, unsupervised human protein-based clustering analysis revealed two distinct CVD risk clusters (low-risk and high-risk) with different blood pressure (by 9 mmHg) and sex-dependent dietary potassium and fiber intake. In the human proteome, the low-risk group had lower angiotensin-converting enzymes, inflammatory proteins associated with neutrophil extracellular trap formation and auto-immune diseases. In the microbial proteome, the low-risk group had higher expression of phosphate acetyltransferase that produces SCFAs, particularly in fiber-fermenting bacteria. This model identified severity across phenotypes in heart failure patients and long-term risk of cardiovascular events in a large population-based cohort. These findings underscore multifactorial gut-to-host mechanisms that may underlie risk factors for CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease and heart failure. Fecal metaproteomic profiles vs. Low-risk vs high-risk clusters was evaluated on Cardiovascular risk clusters and blood pressure differences. Unsupervised clustering of fecal metaproteomes revealed distinct high- and low-risk cardiovascular profiles differing in blood pressure by 9 mmHg and associated with heart failure severity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: