Key result
Preoperative weight loss remains a prominently used tool to assess nutritional status and predict surgical risk, with new developments focusing on body composition assessment.
Why the study?
Does preoperative weight loss predict adverse postoperative outcomes and surgical risk?
Does preoperative weight loss predict adverse postoperative outcomes and surgical risk?
This historical review highlights the enduring relevance of Hiram Studley's 1936 findings that preoperative weight loss is a key predictor of surgical risk and adverse postoperative outcomes.
Sustains preoperative weight loss for surgical risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation of body composition tools.
Hiram Studley's 1936 article of research was the first publication to present a connection between preoperative weight loss and adverse postoperative outcome. Almost 70 years later, weight loss remains one of the most prominently used tools to assess nutritional status and predict surgical risk. This paper provides an overview of surgical practices at the time of Dr Studley and demonstrates Studley's unique contributions to the field of nutrition support. The search for more accurate methods of preoperative nutrition assessment is traced to show how subsequent research continues to validate the use of weight loss in the assessment of surgical risk. New developments center on techniques of body composition assessment to quantify weight lost as functional weight and clarify the impact of malnutrition on operative outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parekh et al. (2004) conducted a review in Surgical risk and malnutrition. Preoperative weight loss was evaluated on Adverse postoperative outcome. Preoperative weight loss remains a prominently used tool to assess nutritional status and predict surgical risk, with new developments focusing on body composition assessment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: