A primary growth crop of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L., cv. S23) was partially wilted and ensiled after the application of either formic acid-water (1:3, w/v; 7.11 l/t fresh herbage; control diet C) or formic acid-formaldehyde (1:1, w/w; 8.8 l/t fresh herbage; formaldehyde treated diet F) which supplied 50 g HCHO/kg crude protein (nitrogen (N) x 6.25). The two silages were fed separately and a third diet comprising formaldehyde-treated silage, supplemented with urea (20 g/kg dry matter DM) at the time of feeding was also examined (diet FU). 2. The three diets were fed at a level of 16 g DM/kg live weight to six 3- to six-month-old cattle fitted with rumen and re-entrant duodenal cannulas in two 3 x 3 Latin Square experiments, and measurements were made of the digestion of energy, carbohydrate and N. 3. The formaldehyde-treated silage had a lower content of fermentation acids and ammonia-N, and a higher content of water-soluble carbohydrate and total amino acids. The apparent digestibility of organic matter, energy and N were depressed (P less than 0.05, P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.01 respectively) by treatment with formaldehyde, but cellulose and neutral-detergent fibre digestibility were unaffected. 4. Within the rumen the digestion of organic matter, cellulose and neutral-detergent fibre were unaffected by formaldehyde treatment or supplementation with urea. Microbial protein synthesis in the rumen was similar for the three diets (average 131 g/kg apparently digested organic matter in the rumen). 5. The application of formic acid-formaldehyde increased (P less than 0.05) the amount of food protein escaping degradation in the rumen (4.76 diet C, 6.89 diet F; 7.07 diet FU g/kg protein intake). The contribution of amino acids of dietary origin at the duodenum increased (P less than 0.05) from 50 (diet C) to 80 (diet F) and 82 (diet FU) g/kg DM intake, and the flow of total amino acids at the duodenum was 33% higher (P less than 0.001) in cattle fed formic acid-formaldehyde silage diets compared with the control silage due to the reduction in degradation of protein at ensiling and in the rumen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thompson et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: