Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The inability to fully activate the quadriceps femoris muscle voluntarily is known to accompany several different knee-joint pathologies. The extent of a voluntary-activation deficit in patients after isolated rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), however, has been reported to be small or nonexistent, making it questionable if a voluntary-activation deficit is a relevant factor for these patients at all. METHODS: In this study the ability to voluntarily activate the quadriceps femoris muscles was quantified in 22 male patients with arthroscopically-proven isolated ACL ruptures using an established highly sensitive twitch-interpolation technique. Furthermore, the maximal voluntary contraction force of the quadriceps muscle was obtained by isometric knee-joint torque measurements. The results were compared with an age-, gender-, and activity-matched control group. RESULTS: There was a moderate but significant mean reduction in maximal voluntary activation (VA) in both the injured (VA: 83.9 +/- 2.3%, mean +/- SEM) and uninjured side (VA: 84.7 +/- 2.2%) in comparison with controls (VA: 91.1 +/- 0.8%). However, of the patients the 23% who presented a considerably reduced voluntary-activation of less than 80% were mainly responsible for the significant mean deficit. CONCLUSIONS: The deficit of isometric muscle strength on the injured side compared with that of controls was explained by the voluntary-activation deficit and a true muscle weakness. On the other hand, the diminished muscle strength of the uninjured side was explained sufficiently by the voluntary-activation deficit alone. Considering the bilateral voluntary-activation deficit, functional muscle tests might not be valid when the uninjured extremity serves as reference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urbach et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: