Key result
Electrical cardioversion in cardiogenic shock is linked to a low ~2% 30-day thromboembolism rate.
Why the study?
Patients with cardiogenic shock and atrial fibrillation or flutter often need acute cardioversion without sufficient anticoagulation or left atrial appendage thrombus exclusion, but their thromboembolic risk is unknown.
Cohort (n=140)
No
In patients with cardiogenic shock, electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation or flutter is associated with a low risk of thromboembolic events (2.1% at 30 days), provided anticoagulation is sufficient, although the incidence of severe bleeding remains high.
Supports ensuring sufficient anticoagulation during cardioversion in cardiogenic shock; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
Visual summary of the study showing patient cohort, endpoints as well as results. * one patient experienced both thromboembolic stroke and systemic embolism. • In cardiogenic shock, stroke risk after cardioversion was low. • Thromboembolic events occurred only with insufficient anticoagulation. • Transesophageal echocardiography was rarely performed before cardioversion. • Severe bleeding occurred in about one in eight patients. Cardiogenic shock patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter often require acute cardioversion despite absence of sufficient anticoagulation or the possibility to rule out left atrial appendage thrombus. Thromboembolic risk in these patients is unknown. In this study, all cardiogenic shock patients from the LMUshock registry undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter were included. The primary endpoint was new thromboembolic stroke or systemic embolism at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included performance of transesophageal echocardiography, all-cause mortality and bleeding according to BARC. Of 140 patients undergoing electrical cardioversion, 36 had preexisting and 104 experienced new onset of atrial fibrillation or flutter during ICU stay. Of these, 87.1 % had anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and anticoagulation was adjudicated sufficient in 44.3 % at the time of cardioversion. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 37.9 % of patients before cardioversion. The primary endpoint was met in 3 patients (2.1 %), all of which had insufficient anticoagulation. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 37.9 % and bleeding ≥ BARC type 3a was found in 12.9 %. Thromboembolic risk of electrical cardioversion was low despite the limited utilization of transesophageal echocardiography. This may be attributed to the routine administration of therapeutic anticoagulation in this study, but a high incidence of bleeding was observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gmeiner et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiogenic shock with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (n=140). Electrical cardioversion was evaluated on Incidence of new thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke or systemic embolism) at 30 days. Electrical cardioversion in patients with cardiogenic shock was associated with a low 2.1% rate of thromboembolic stroke or systemic embolism at 30 days, which occurred exclusively during insufficient anticoagulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: