Key result
Standing arm ergometry elicited significantly smaller maximal increases in rate-pressure product and oxygen uptake, and less ST-segment depression, compared to treadmill exercise in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Why the study?
Does standing arm ergometry elicit similar cardiorespiratory and ischemic responses compared to treadmill exercise in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
Randomized order of tests
No
Does standing arm ergometry elicit similar cardiorespiratory and ischemic responses compared to treadmill exercise in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Standing arm ergometry elicits lower cardiorespiratory and ischemic responses than treadmill exercise, indicating it has lower sensitivity for detecting ischemic heart disease.
Arm ergometry may underestimate ischemia in IHD; leaves open its diagnostic role versus treadmill testing.
To compare cardiorespiratory responses to standing arm ergometry and treadmill exercise, two graded exercise stress tests were performed in 30 patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Cardiac catheterization and expired gas analyses were also done. Standing arm ergometry was discontinued because of arm fatigue in 15 (50%) patients, whereas treadmill exercise was stopped due to leg fatigue in 8 (27%) patients. Maximal increase in rate-pressure product and oxygen uptake, and magnitude of ST-segment depression during standing arm ergometry were significantly smaller (p less than 0.01, p less than 0.01 and p less than 0.05, respectively) than those during treadmill exercise. Furthermore correlations of maximal change in rate-pressure product, oxygen uptake and extent of ST-segment depression were not close between the two exercise tests (r = 0.76, r = 0.67 and r = 0.54, respectively). Our results indicate that the ability to detect IHD with standing arm ergometry is lower than that with treadmill exercise and that it is not possible to predict accurately one's capacity for arm exercise from the treadmill exercise test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishii et al. (1991) conducted a cross-sectional in Ischemic heart disease (n=30). Standing arm ergometry vs. Treadmill exercise was evaluated on Maximal increase in rate-pressure product (x10^2) (p=<0.01). Standing arm ergometry elicited significantly smaller maximal increases in rate-pressure product and oxygen uptake, and less ST-segment depression, compared to treadmill exercise in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: