Key result
The first treadmill exercise test in patients with angina pectoris yielded significantly poorer performance than subsequent tests, with a mean difference of 2.3 ± 0.33 total minutes of walking.
Why the study?
Does the first treadmill test yield different exercise tolerance results compared to subsequent tests in patients with angina pectoris?
Observational (n=63)
Does the first treadmill test yield different exercise tolerance results compared to subsequent tests in patients with angina pectoris?
Mean Difference: 2.3
The first treadmill test in patients with angina pectoris underestimates exercise capacity, but subsequent tests are highly reproducible when using a defined symptomatic end point.
First treadmill tests may underestimate capacity in angina; leaves open whether repeated testing improves prognostic value in trials.
A retrospective analysis was made of the reproducibility of a treadmill exercise tolerance test performed on patients with angina pectoris to an end point of moderately severe (3+) angina. One hundred and forty tests (70 pairs) in 63 patients were found to meet criteria for inclusion in the study. In 30 patients a comparison of the first test the patient had ever had with a subsequent test revealed a significantly poorer performance on the first test; mean differences ± one standard error of the mean between the first test and the subsequent tests were 0.90 ± 0.20 min of walking from the start of the test to the onset of angina, 2.3 ± 0.33 total min of walking, and 5.8 ± 0.86 "exercise units" attained at the end point of "3+" angina. In 40 patients a comparison of two tests, neither of which was the patients' first test, revealed no significant differences in performance; mean differences between the two tests were 0.20 ± 0.23 min of walking at the onset of angina, 0.11 ± 0.07 min of walking and 0.18 ± 0.15 exercise units attained at the end point of "3+" angina. There were no significant differences in maximum heart rates attained between any of the tests. In using treadmill testing to quantitate exercise capacity in angina pectoris, the first test is likely to yield a poorer performance than subsequent ones. Tests subsequent to the first are highly reproducible when a specifically defined symptomatic end point of moderately severe intensity is employed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smokler et al. (1973) conducted an observational in Angina pectoris (n=63). First treadmill exercise tolerance test vs. Subsequent treadmill tests was evaluated on Total minutes of walking (MD 2.3). The first treadmill exercise test in patients with angina pectoris yielded significantly poorer performance than subsequent tests, with a mean difference of 2.3 ± 0.33 total minutes of walking.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: