Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Galectin-3 (Gal-3), a pleiotropic beta-galactoside-binding protein, was shown to be involved in several nuclear-dependent functions, including up-regulation of transcriptional factors, RNA processing, and cell cycle regulation. Gal-3 compartmentalization in the nucleus versus the cytoplasm affects, in part, the malignant phenotype of various cancers. However, to date, the mechanism by which Gal-3 translocates into the nucleus remains debatable. Thus, we have constructed and expressed a variety of fusion proteins containing deletion mutants of Gal-3 fused with monomers, dimers, and trimers of enhanced green fluorescent protein and searched for the Gal-3 sequence motifs essential for its nuclear localization in vivo. In addition, a digitonin-permeabilized, cell-free transport in vitro assay was used to directly examine the mechanism of Gal-3 nuclear import. Partial deletions of the COOH-terminal region (114-250) of the human Gal-3 significantly decreases its nuclear translocation, whereas a peptide (1-115) was transported to the nuclei. The in vitro nuclear import assay revealed that there are at least two independent nuclear pathways for shuttling Gal-3 into the nucleus: a passive diffusion and an active transport. This is the first article providing direct evidence for the nuclear import mechanisms of Gal-3 and suggests that Gal-3 nuclear translocation is governed by dual pathways, whereas the cytoplasmic/nuclear distribution may be regulated by multiple processes, including cytoplasmic anchorage, nuclear retention, and or nuclear export. These results may lead to the development of a therapeutic modality aiming at abrogating Gal-3 translocation into the nucleus and thus hampering its activity during cancer progression and metastasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakahara et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: