Key result
A novel prescriptive analytics method accounting for investment-related characteristics consistently and significantly outperformed prevalent methods in improving cost effectiveness.
Why the study?
Containing skyrocketing healthcare costs is imperative, but existing prescriptive analytics methods for clinical decision making often overlook investment-related characteristics and ignore investment decisions.
A novel prescriptive analytics method incorporating investment-related characteristics improves cost-effectiveness in clinical decision making compared to existing methods.
May enhance cost-effectiveness in clinical decisions; leaves open prospective validation in cardiovascular settings.
Containing skyrocketing health care costs is imperative. Toward that end, prescriptive analytics that analyzes health care data to recommend optimal decisions is both relevant and crucial. We develop a novel prescriptive analytics method to improve the cost effectiveness in clinical decision making (CDM), a critical health care dimension that can greatly benefit from analytics. Effective prescriptive analytics for CDM has to address its probabilistic, cost-sensitive, and investment-related characteristics simultaneously. Unlike existing methods that often overlook the investment-related characteristic, the proposed method accounts for all of these characteristics. Specifically, our method considers two sets of costs associated with clinical decisions—before and after an investment—in combination with the probabilities of cost changes due to the investment. In contrast, prevalent methods only emphasize one set of costs, before an investment. Furthermore, the proposed method involves both clinical and investment decisions, whereas existing methods ignore investment decisions. Empirical evaluations with two real-world clinical data sets indicate that the proposed method consistently and significantly outperforms several salient methods from previous research, thereby demonstrating the value of addressing the investment-related characteristic in efforts to improve CDM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2021) studied Clinical decision making. Novel prescriptive analytics method vs. Prevalent methods was evaluated on Cost effectiveness. A novel prescriptive analytics method accounting for investment-related characteristics consistently and significantly outperformed prevalent methods in improving cost effectiveness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: