We apply meta‐regression techniques to provide a quantitative review of the empirical literature on how research and development (R&D) expenses affect the effective tax rate (ETR). R&D expenses relate to a well‐accepted profit shifting channel, strategic placement of intellectual property within a multinational entity. Using a unique hand‐collected data set, we add a new perspective to the current base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) state of research and debate, in three ways: First, observing that primary studies report mixed evidence on how R&D expenses affect ETR, we provide a consensus estimate for this effect. Second, we consider this effect in more detail by separating a tax accounting effect and a profit shifting effect, which to our knowledge has not yet been investigated. We detect that one‐third of the R&D effect on the ETR is due to the tax accounting effect and could be mitigated via book‐tax conformity. We further find that 10% of the profit shifting effect can be traced back to R&D tax credits. Third, our meta‐regression reveals factors that are possible sources of variation and bias in previous empirical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belz et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: