Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preprint and supplementary material to accompany Anglim, J., Bozic, S., Little, J., Lievens, F. (2017). Response Distortion on Personality Tests in Applicants: Comparing High-Stakes to Low-Stakes Medical Settings. Advances in Health Science Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9796-81. item level characteristics for the NEO-PI3 (i.e., mean, standard deviation, percentages for each response option, loading on first factor). See Excel file.2. Supplementary analyses
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anglim et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: