Asymptotically optimal real-valued bit allocation among a set of quantizers for a finite collection of sources was derived in 1963 by Huang and Schultheiss, and an algorithm for obtaining an optimal nonnegative integer-valued bit allocation was given by Fox in 1966. We prove that, for a given bit budget, the set of optimal nonnegative integer-valued bit allocations is equal to the set of nonnegative integer-valued bit allocation vectors which minimize the Euclidean distance to the optimal real-valued bit-allocation vector of Huang and Schultheiss. We also give an algorithm for finding optimal nonnegative integer-valued bit allocations. The algorithm has lower computational complexity than Fox's algorithm, as the bit budget grows. Finally, we compare the performance of the Huang-Schultheiss solution to that of an optimal integer-valued bit allocation. Specifically, we derive upper and lower bounds on the deviation of the mean-squared error (MSE) using optimal integer-valued bit allocation from the MSE using optimal real-valued bit allocation. It is shown that, for asymptotically large transmission rates, optimal integer-valued bit allocations do not necessarily achieve the same performance as that predicted by Huang-Schultheiss for optimal real-valued bit allocations
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farber et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: