Why the study?
Single-lead ECG screening in the general population faces challenges from very low AF prevalence and large numbers of ECGs per participant, complicating effective participant-level diagnosis.
Does a dynamic training approach improve the performance of an RR-interval-based AF detection model compared to a fixed approach?
Does a dynamic training approach improve the performance of an RR-interval-based AF detection model compared to a fixed approach?
A dynamic training approach improves the accuracy of single-lead ECG-based AF detection models at both the ECG and participant levels, facilitating real-world clinical applications.
In recent developments, single-lead ECGs can now be captured outside clinical environments, opening opportunities for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection in the general population. However, this introduces significant challenges, including a very low AF prevalence rate in the captured datasets and a large number of ECGs per participant, which complicates the task of diagnosing participants effectively.In this study, a dynamic training approach which trained models to detect AF from ECGs, was introduced to incorporate more non-AF ECGs during training compared to a fixed approach, and the performance of both approaches was compared in terms of ECG classification and participant diagnosis. The two approaches were compared by separately training an RR-interval-based AF detection model using the Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce Stroke (SAFER) dataset. The participant-level testing was derived from two straightforward transitions by applying the ECG classification model.Results showed that the dynamic strategy consistently outperformed the fixed strategy, achieving higher AUROC (0.92-0.94 versus 0.90-0.92) and AUPRC scores (0.38-0.75 versus 0.12-0.66) on both ECG-level and participant-level testing tasks.Clinical relevance- Models in this study were trained using the Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce Stroke (SAFER) dataset, which was real-world data captured during the screening stage of a clinical trial. The findings suggest that the dynamic training approach not only advances the accuracy of ECG-level classification, but also demonstrates its applicability at the participant-level diagnosis, which is a crucial step toward real-world clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2025) studied Atrial Fibrillation. Dynamic training approach vs. Fixed training approach was evaluated on ECG classification and participant diagnosis (AUROC and AUPRC).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: