Implementation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients remains suboptimal despite existing guidelines, requiring further investigation using implementation science methods.
Implementation science approaches are needed to address the lagging uptake of VTE prophylaxis guidelines in trauma patients.
ABSTRACT: Disease burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE) without pharmacologic prophylaxis is high in trauma patients. Although VTE prophylaxis guidelines exist, studies on real-world use of VTE prophylaxis in trauma shows limited uptake of guideline recommendations. Despite existing guidelines, reports indicate that VTE prophylaxis implementation across trauma centers is lagging. Implementation barriers of VTE prophylaxis in trauma are multifactorial, and VTE prescribing practices require further optimization. Implementation science methods can help standardize and improve care; well-established approaches in medical and surgical hospitalized patients and their effects on clinical outcomes such as VTE and bleeding complications must be investigated because they apply to trauma patients. Nonadministration of VTE prophylaxis medications in hospitalized patients is associated with VTE events and remains a barrier to providing optimal defect-free care. Further investigations are required for VTE prophylaxis implementation across all trauma populations.
Ratnasekera et al. (Tue,) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism in trauma patients. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was evaluated. Implementation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients remains suboptimal despite existing guidelines, requiring further investigation using implementation science methods.