Key result
A single pass defibrillation lead provided 100% sensitivity and 96.5% specificity for ventricular arrhythmias, but loss of atrial capture in 45% of patients precludes its use for atrial pacing.
Why the study?
Does a single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead provide reliable sensing and pacing performance in patients receiving dual chamber ICDs?
Observational (n=57)
Does a single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead provide reliable sensing and pacing performance in patients receiving dual chamber ICDs?
While the single pass defibrillation lead performs well for ventricular arrhythmia discrimination, its high rate of atrial capture loss precludes its use in patients dependent on atrial pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Atrial capture loss precludes single-pass leads for atrial pacing-dependent ICD patients; leaves open need for randomized sensing trials.
Dual chamber ICDs are increasingly implanted nowadays, mainly to improve discrimination between supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias but also to maintain AV synchrony in patients with bradycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate a new single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead capable of true bipolar sensing and pacing in the right atrium and integrated bipolar sensing and pacing in the right ventricle. The performance of the lead was evaluated in 57 patients (age 61 +/- 12 years; New York Heart Association 1.9 +/- 0.6, left ventricular ejection fraction 0.38 +/- 0.15) at implant, at prehospital discharge, and during a 1-year follow-up. Sensing and pacing behavior of the lead was evaluated in six different body positions. In four patients, no stable position of the atrial electrode could intraoperatively be found. The intraoperative atrial sensing was 2.3 +/- 1.6 mV and the atrial pacing threshold 0.8 +/- 0.5 V at 0.5 ms. At follow-up, the atrial sensing ranged from 1.5 mV to 2.2 mV and the atrial pacing threshold product from 0.8 to 1.7 V/ms. In 11 patients, an intermittent atrial sensing problem and in 24 patients an atrial pacing dysfunction were observed in at least one body position. In 565 episodes, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.5% were found for ventricular arrhythmias. In conclusion, this single pass defibrillation lead performed well as a VDD lead and for dual chamber arrhythmia discrimination. However, loss of atrial capture in 45% of patients preclude its use in patients depending on atrial pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gradaus et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Patients requiring dual chamber ICDs (n=57). Single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead was evaluated on Sensing and pacing behavior of the lead. A single pass defibrillation lead provided 100% sensitivity and 96.5% specificity for ventricular arrhythmias, but loss of atrial capture in 45% of patients precludes its use for atrial pacing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: