Key result
Neurotechnologies for post-stroke motor recovery show heterogeneous effects, underscoring the need for personalized approaches.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights the need for personalized rehabilitation strategies and closed-loop neuromodulation to enhance post-stroke motor recovery.
Stroke remains a significant global health challenge, imposing substantial socioeconomic burdens. Post-stroke neurorehabilitation aims to maximize functional recovery and mitigate persistent disability through effective neuromodulation, while many patients experience prolonged recovery periods with suboptimal outcomes. This review explores innovative neurotechnologies and therapeutic strategies enhancing neuroplasticity for post-stroke motor recovery, with a particular focus on the subacute and chronic phases. We examine key neuroplasticity mechanisms and rehabilitation models informing neurotechnology use, including the vicariation model, the interhemispheric competition model, and the bimodal balance-recovery model. Building on these theoretical foundations, current neurotechnologies are categorized into endogenous drivers of neuroplasticity (e.g., task-oriented training, brain-computer interfaces) and exogenous drivers (e.g., brain stimulation, muscular electrical stimulation, robot-assisted passive movement). However, most approaches lack tailored adjustments combining volitional behavior with brain neuromodulation. Given the heterogeneous effects of current neurotechnologies, we propose that future directions should focus on personalized rehabilitation strategies and closed-loop neuromodulation. These advanced approaches may provide deeper insights into neuroplasticity and potentially expand recovery possibilities for stroke patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2025) conducted a review in Post-stroke motor recovery. Neurotechnologies and therapeutic strategies was evaluated. Current neurotechnologies for post-stroke motor recovery demonstrate heterogeneous effects and lack tailored adjustments, highlighting the need for personalized, closed-loop neuromodulation strategies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: