Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors propose a general individual catastrophe risk model that allows damage ratios to be random functions of the catastrophe intensity. They derive some distributional properties of the insured risks and of the aggregate catastrophic loss under this model. Through the model and ruin probability calculations, they formally illustrate the well-known fact that the catastrophe risk cannot be diversified through premium collection alone, as is the case with the usual “day-to-day” risk, even for an arbitrary large portfolio. They also derive some risk orderings between different catastrophe portfolios and show that the risk level of a realistic portfolio falls between that of a portfolio of comonotonic risks and that of a portfolio of independent risks. Finally, the authors illustrate their findings with a numerical example inspired from earthquake insurance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cossette et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: