Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper evaluates and describes methods for making psychiatric distinctions. It is by means of psychiatric distinctions that individuals are labelled mentally ill or mentally well. Within the mentally ill category, patients are differentially placed according to the severity and type of their mental illness. The placement of individuals into psychiatric categories is an essential prerequisite not only to the clinical treatment of patients but also to any research where the objective is to determine empirical regularities associated with mental illness. Until the patient is categorized, the practitioner has no logical guide for how to perform treatment or even whether he should treat the patient-i.e. the patient may not be a patient. Similarly, unless the psychiatric researcher has categorized his subjects according to some notion of mental illness he has no way of making comparisons or of assessing change, the two essential processes in research. Thus, the logical first step for any discovery of new knowledge in the field of mental illness is to appraise the reliability and validity of methods for making psychiatric distinctions. No research findings can be more reliable or valid than the psychiatric distinctions used in carrying out the research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donald Conover (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: